Friday, April 13, 2012
Newest endorsement
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Zoning and property rights
What I would like to do is make sure that the zoning is represented with the lowest limits on individual rights and allow people to build and create wealth with their investments, while ensuring the minimums.
I am for reducing the zoning and moving it out of the commissions hands, but moving it to a local level control, so the commission isn't always able to step on people's individual rights. For example, there are farmers that have their properties zoned for one type of crop, but they have to get special permission to move to a different crop, which costs time and money, while a neighboring farm is free zoned and does not have that kind of restriction.
Also, if that same farmer would like to add some small manufacturing to his area, so he can process his own crops, the whole area could be rezoned as manufacturing, instead of just the small area where the manufacturing would take place.
The County should still make sure and have a basic idea of the zoning of roads and future growth, but in a way that those who sell and those that don't aren't forced into changing what they do with their land. Let me give you an example, in North San Diego, at the beginning of the 80's they planned a whole series of cross freeways to join the I-5 and I-15, as they run more or less parallel to each other. Now at that time, there was no one selling the land, and not a whole lot of need for the freeways, so what they did was to give them right of purchase when someone wanted to buy the land where the freeways would be. This gave the city the chance to save for the purchase, bought the land when the owner was interested in selling, and knew what kind of businesses or housing would go into the area, because it was determined by the buyer, not the city. They planned for several cross freeways, and those that sold first were the ones that were developed, some of them were abandoned, because the need was no longer there.
So that is what we need to do for Utah County, I hope that you will take this into consideration. It is always nice to talk to people that have expertise in an area.
Many of my ideas come from a book called, "The Seamless City,"by Rick Baker. It takes on the redevelopment of a city in Florida using conservative methods.
John
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Sacred responsibilities
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
What is life worth?
"Count it the greatest sin to prefer life to honor, and for the sake of living lose what makes life worth living." --Roman poet Decimus Juvenal (c. 1st - 2nd century)
Thursday, March 1, 2012
The path to Convention
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
New FDA regulations
Last year there was a new piece of legislature that promised to regulate food improve food safety through new laws and restrictions guidelines. That translated into new ways that the government can monitor and enforce onerous new requirements for all sorts of different things that aren’t part of the intended use of the law. After all, we know that Congress really only passes laws so that we can tell what is actually in it.
It is now being revealed that as a result of the new FDA powers that were added they are able to start pulling off the market any product that they do not agree with, instead of the current method that is currently in use, which gives the United States a clear advantage over the rest of the world. Many of the products that we use commonly, such as vitamins, minerals, gingko, ginseng, Reservitrol, garlic oil, aloe vera and many others, are not allowed to be sold outside of pharmacies, if at all. These products natural benefits that allow the average consumer to avoid using pharmaceutical products that have side effects and are much more costly, not to mention fit nicely in the Obamacare health plan. The current FDA proposed regulations would move us towards becoming more like those countries. This is a direct attack on Freedom and liberty. It is a direct attack on a large number of employers and companies here in Utah, especially Utah County.
On Thursday, September 8 there is a call-in campaign that is being organized to let our senators and representatives know that we do not support another attack on business, one that provides health benefits and employment to thousands. Please join me and many others to call in and let your US representatives know that we are drawing a line where they may not cross.
Here are some points to mention:
- Request that Congress direct the FDA to carefully review their draft guidance, and unless they amend the guidance to reflect my concerns, to call hearings at the end of the review process.
- When the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act was passed, Congress intended there be a simple notification system for new supplements. But now the FDA is turning it into a pre-approval scheme—one that Congress never intended. This will reduce the number of supplements sold and increase the cost of those that remain.
- Ask that the FDA honor Congressional intent and protect access to supplements
Mention at least one of the following points on your call:
- Congress recognized that dietary supplements are natural ingredients and therefore inherently safer than drugs and chemical food additives. It did not intend that the FDA would have the power to approve or reject dietary supplements.
- The FDA’s draft guidance creates unnecessary regulations that limit my access to the dietary supplements I rely on. The expensive and burdensome process will force between 20,000 and 42,000 dietary supplements to be removed from the market and will increase the cost of those supplements that remain.
- The draft guidance hurts our economy. Expert analyses show that this guidance will cause a total economic loss of $21.2 billion to $39.8 billion annually.
Closing:
· Please keep close watch of the FDA to stop them from defying Congressional intent with their new draft guidance.
To look up your representative use this link: http://www.commoncause.org/siteapps/advocacy/search.aspx?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=4860375
For those that live in Utah, here are the phone numbers for your representatives:
Senator Orrin Hatch’s offices:
Washington: 202–224–5251
Utah: 801–524–4380
Senator Mike Lee’s offices:
Washington: 202–224–5444
Utah: 801–524–5933
Representative Jim Matheson’s offices:
Washington: 202–225–3011
Utah: 801–486–1236
Representative Rob Bishop’s offices:
Washington: 202–225–0453
Utah: 801–625–0107
Representative Jason Chaffetz’s offices:
Washington: 202–225–7751
Utah: 801–282–5502